The world deserves a break, no rather we need a break from the duo who claim to want a life of privacy, but instead they bombard the media platforms (or anyone who will listen to their drivel) with their PR stories full of their immodest self-praising activities. Harry on his broken soapbox waving his arms around as he tries to remember his lines, while TW perches on a bench regurgitating her cult led rhetoric with trigger and buzz words to invoke the ‘woke’ SJW and activists that hop on any bandwagon going. Both deliver their self-serving hypocritical sermons to the servile cult members, as those who ignored them previously can now see them for the phoney pontificators that they are. Their empty gestures are in aid of some much needed positive press that they crave and desire, but bandwagons can crash and collapse.
Vax Live came and went, and no one really took much notice of it because is seemed like a tax write off, and a pathetic excuse for some PR for celebrities and politicians who need an image boost. The viewing figures weren’t high, nor was the interest either, because the world has been, and still are working together to help each other get through the pandemic, and no one has time for what was an overhyped PR event.
The UK media ignored TW’s political rant, where she was ostentatiously attired for a charity message that should have lasted less than a minute. Instead, she used the platform to further her own agendas and even the sugary reporters decided it was inappropriate and didn’t mention it. However, some did mention in passing Harry’s appearance, but again he was talking politics, or rather he attempted to because he clearly didn’t have a clue what he was actually saying, but at least his flailing arms amused us as the masses mocked him again for uttering nonsense. It would have been much better for him if he merely smiled for photos, and left it at that, but without his title there would be even less interest in him.
The Sussexes have been at it again with their pauper orchestra of one string tiny violins playing in the background, plying the sugar media outlets with their ‘woe is me’ rhetoric, with more stories of Harry’s frosty reception when he returned to the UK. Didn’t he realize that people had given him a pass due to the fact he attended a funeral, and the reaction would/will be far worse when he shows up again?
While many Americans claim they aren’t interested in them, the question is why are the media outlets giving them a platform? Why are they spending time on them, and by the looks of things trying to cash in on them with special editions? I had to ask some US pals if the LA Times magazine was genuine, or whether it was a mocked image by a cult member, and apparently it is real. For $15, I can think of buying something far more useful like some tubs of Ben and Jerry’s ice cream, or a large pan pizza from Pizza Hut – both far more satisfying than an expensive fantasy comic book. Let’s put it this way, only a foolish media outlet that wants to lose money would put something like that out here in the UK, and only a journalist who never wanted to work again would put their name to it.
Even the Washington Post seems to think that they understand the masses, yet the comments were overwhelmingly negative, and mocked the WaPo, asking them were they paid to publish irrelevant stories. While BP keeps repeating the tired old phrase that they are not working members of the RF and don’t represent the RF, that doesn’t stop the American media from claiming that they are. Nor does it stop the media from allowing them to monetize those links and their titles, and in fact enables and promotes them. That is why The Queen should remove the titles to prevent any further commercial abuse. If BP and RF don’t consider it an abuse, then they really don’t deserve any respect or loyalty from the People whom they allegedly claim to serve, when it is obvious to the man/woman on the street that the duo are exploiting and abusing the titles.
What did Harry’s mini rant/whingefest say? Apart from a free impromptu hand puppet show from him, he mutters something about science being politicized, and that ‘so many things’ have been politicized, yet it’s clear he hasn’t a clue what he has said, or what the words he uttered meant. There is a bit of drama when he talks of life and death, and that vaccines ‘cannot’ be politicized. Not sure what he has been reading or who he has been listening too (bar TW), because vaccines are being distributed around the world and that was always the plan as soon as the vaccines were considered safe. No one needed a group of PR hungry people to tell the experts to do what they already had planned to do, and what they have been doing.
There are underlying factors as to why the spread has continued in some countries, and why the mortality rate has been higher and it’s not down to politics. As many people have mentioned, there are other issues such as medical supplies, facilities to store the vaccines, trained staff to administer the vaccines, and so many other elements that are part of the procedure that do require government guidelines, and that’s to protect their citizens and the medical staff.
The Archewell gravy train couldn’t stop without a bit of publicity on Mother’s Day (in the US), and another easy to please charity was drafted in to gain some free exposure. This time it was Harvest Home, a charity in LA that helps homeless pregnant women, and it promoted the P&G and Archewell collaboration before the official announcement.
While P&G can supply many essential items as donations, one cannot ignore the fact these will be written off as charitable gifts, and the publicity is worth more to them. I’m sure the charity isn’t so concerned with the ethics behind the motives of the other parties, and are grateful for the donations, yet there is something a little unclean about it all, yet charities cannot question or criticize the motives of their donors, or should they?
TW’s own speech during Vax Live saw her perched on a bench laden with plumped up pillows, where at first glance you can be forgiven for thinking she was wearing a pendant of the anti-christ. It certainly isn’t something you should wear going into a church, but there is no fear of that as I doubt TW has stepped foot inside a church unless there was a photographer nearby. Some may have thought it was a symbol of devil worshipping, but it was some sort of of activist symbol (I’m being deliberately vague here) that the company were eager to exploit, and who quickly jumped on a bandwagon to promote their wares and their company.
What I found more enlightening is their lack of knowledge and understanding of the Monarchy, and the abuse of titles for commercial use. However, this appeared to be a prime example of how ill-informed some Americans are as they tagged the RF, The Queen, and Kate in their promotional post, thereby associating TW with the RF, thus in turn make the assumption that TW represents the RF on behalf of the nation
It is this lack of knowledge that is exploited by the duo, and why BP’s comments make little headway or difference when they state that the Sussexes are no longer working members of the RF. Unfortunately, this kind of message is only useful to those who have the capacity to understand it (as in they need to be more direct – the Sussexes have nothing to do with us), and shows that the uneducated masses believe that the Sussexes do represent the nation and the RF. BP can’t stop the Americans from doing this, nor can they ‘educate’ them on what their statements mean in plain English, so the best thing to do is to stop the source, and to halt the abuse and commercialization and monetization of a royal title that had been a gift by removing it.
Did anyone really need to listen to her? I mean, she kind of missed the memo that it was a charity event, draped in clothing and accessories that would have vaccinated several African towns, and the smile turned into a sneer and snide smirk subconsciously every now and then between obvious takes. The 2 minute 36 second video clip is about 2 minutes too long where it is obvious that TW is using this as a platform for her own agenda. Why mention gender equality, and women who have suffered through Covid-19? The virus did not discriminate – people of all ages, and genders have suffered and lost, so why did she discriminate?
The Spectator tried to find the source of her information, which appeared to be nothing but speculative statements aimed at her target audience to build up momentum, and it looked as if she was ‘selective’ with the raw data that some reports that have been published. However, IMHO, it is unwise to make public statements on raw data, especially concerning issues that are ongoing as that data can alter, and could have been based on various factors that would not necessarily represent the study field accurately.
There are the usual buzz/trigger words used such as ‘connecting, communities, rebuild, and equity’, that you can predict what she is going to say without losing 2 minutes of your life. She also uses the space to trigger her causes by talking about gender based violence, and gender equity, and making the plight of women her focus. Many women don’t want to be labelled as victims, but this is TW’s target audience, aimed at hitting some nerves and to gain traction and followers, but her words are prejudicial, as she plays the race card again. Is this actually relevant to fundraising for vaccines that are supplied free or at cost? Again, she sounds like a broken record – the kind that you take great delight in snapping in half so that you never have to hear it again.
She banters on about the vaccine ‘drive’ which was in place before the event was even advertised, giving a misleading statement about government policies around the world in how they distributed their vaccines. To many, she was jumping on a bandwagon to gain some publicty and credit. The emphasis was on her feminist activist causes, which are words that the bulk of the cult wanted to hear. It’s all very boring as she pontificates on women being empowered for leadership, and ironically she talks about talking and meeting friends again. These are shallow and empty words from someone who has ghosted her friends and family, and Harry, who has alienated all of his friends and family (real friends and not play friends he has met through a charity gig) since meeting TW. Has TW reached out to her father, or siblings? I’m sure if she had that the Sussex PR would have leaked it while it was happening. As for her local community, locals appear to have upped sticks away from the duo, and some say their presence has devalued the area…
The duo appear to have a chronic case of lyingitis that Procter & Gamble don’t seem to have a cure for, as they state they are, “…beyond excited…” to announce a partnership with Archewell. The public are beyond repulsed at a major company choosing to support what can only be described as an entity that was a covert traitorous body, that has viciously attacked a nation and called them racist, made false allegations about the British Royal Family of being racist, has spread misinformation and disinformation, has broken and ignored agreements made with The Queen, has spread and encouraged hate and disharmony around the world (via their cult), used public interviews to lie about events knowing that the other parties cannot defend themselves to look like victims, and who have been dishonest, and who are abusing the titles they were gifted for personal financial gain. What is worse is that the company holds a Royal Warrant that they should be stripped of. How can any company with any integrity support those who have betrayed others, and who continue to do so?
While Procter & Gamble have had sectors of society boycotting their products for other reasons, this only highlights those issues (environmental issues, ethical labour practices, and animal testing are some of the main reasons), and by adding their support for a company founded by traitors, this will not give them the kind of publicity they had expected.
As for the ridiculously childish tweet, it makes you wonder how old is the social impact officer or whoever has access to their social media? Perhaps someone needs to cut down on their caffeinated and artificial coloured fizzy drinks intake if they want to write professional social media posts? The #boycottProcterandGamble hashtags seem to be trending, as people search for alternatives to their products, as the People react in revulsion to the news of the collaboration with the Phoney Pontificators.
The Harry and OW show
The overhyped show on mental health that Harry and OW have been working on for years is finally being promoted with the ironic title of, ‘The Me You Can’t See’, because the duo don’t wish to acknowledge that a huge majority of the world really wish that they didn’t have to see them, or hear from them ever again.
Apparently there will be two shows on Apple TV+, shown on 21 May 2021, but the skeptics are wondering if this is just another bandwagon that the duo have hopped on in order to gain some cult followers (as most are vulnerable to these sensitive issues)? People will seek informative shows on a topic that is a silent killer, but who would trust or want to listen to Harry or OW? People want a reliable source and the recent interview exposed all parties as untrustworthy, as they knowingly promoted inaccurate and harmful statements, and put them out in the public domain. How can they be trusted with a sensitive topic such as mental health? Apparently the show is a selection of stories from those who have suffered from mental health issues according to the PR blurb, so what did OW and Harry actually do as ‘executive producers’ of the show?
The publicity also tells us that Harry had access to mental health experts during the making of the show for several years, which begs the question as to why he was unable to seek assistance for TW who claimed she needed help? Not only did Harry have access to various charities, and individuals in the field he could have sought help from, it also begs the question as to how suited he is to deal with the topic, where it appears he should be an inpatient. Mental health issues need to be handled with care and responsibility, yet neither OW or Harry appear to have shown that they possess such traits.
As the ANL appeal has still yet to be decided, Jason Knauf has announced his resignation which wasn’t a surprise. If I had been in his shoes, I would have asked for a transfer back in April 2018, when Edward Lane-Fox left, and failing that, as soon as ‘that letter’ was written. Perhaps this frees him in some way should he be required to be a witness for any other issues that he may have knowledge of, and remember that Amy Pickerill resigned in May 2019, allegedly to move overseas (somehow London wasn’t overseas), and was rehired by the Cambridges once the Sussexes had gone. His position was untenable after the TW allegations, because despite the sparse versions of events (both with lots of holes) that both sides have given, the ANL source seemed a whole lot more credible.
People will always look at him and wonder if he covered up a lie that set out to harm an old man, and did he enable what appeared to be a manipulated PR exercise to assist in promoting TW’s victim persona to the world? You can’t stop people thinking and pointing the finger, and the reputation of BP and KP has been badly damaged by this, yet their PR people are saying ‘it’s okay and under control’, but they are merely telling their clients what they want to hear. Looks like the only one left is Sara Latham, but did she ‘bury the money and bodies’ before the exit? Perhaps she already knew and was prepared? The People have a right to hear her testimony, and if she was in contact with Sunshine Sachs regarding ‘that book’ and the content.
So much damage has been caused, careers ruined, and people have been harmed, and what for? To appease a wayward, disloyal, and traitorous family member? If so, then Your Majesty, that is a weakness that requires action to rectify the situation. The People are turning against you, and a Monarch who fails to listen or acknowledge the voices of the People will have failed in their duty. We do not wish you to fail, but that Fate is in your hands alone.
Harry Markle ~ Traditional British Pro-monarchy Satire! 
You must be logged in to post a comment.